This week's readings were diverse in content but were similar in the concept being explored. The idea of agency is one that most people have similar definitions of. In general, people think of agency as being synonymous with autonomy. Agency supposedly means the ability to makes decisions and choices off of one's own accord rather than by someone else's decisions. However, the article Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted states that "we have for a long time understood an agent as one who through conscious intention or free will causes changes in the world. But I suggest that neither conscious intention nor free will—at least as we commonly think of them—is involved in acting or bringing about change..." (Cooper, 421). Cooper goes on to explain her thought process and essentially explains that no man or woman is an island; everyone makes their decisions and forms their opinions using data from the real world, which often comes in form of their friend's and family's thoughts. The way someone was raised by their parents, their elementary school teachers' values, and the conversations people have with their social circle all alter how people think and thus make decisions. People inherently cannot fully make decisions without having some influence from an outside source, and thus are less autonomous than they might think.
While in general, I've always considered myself someone to have a solid head on my shoulders and am relatively aware I am seeking advice and thus removing some of my own agency. After reading this article by Cooper I realize how right she is in many ways. For example, I have recently contemplated getting a dog. The idea was not one I had considered fully, I've always loved dogs and wanted one badly, but I've never really been in a position to have one. Now that I am in a position to have a dog the thought became a little more plausible, while still not likely. At dinner, with my family, I brought it up in passing and the mild conversation turned into a full discussion. By the end of the night, I had more opinions than I knew what to do with. Initially, I planned to only listen to my own opinion, but their thoughts had been planted in my head. I couldn't ignore my family's thoughts. While I would still be making a decision by myself the decision would be influenced by those who gave their opinions no matter what I did. Cooper's argument that agency doesn't really exist in the way we expect it to is correct. While getting a dog or not is a big decision it is small when it's compared to real-life matters like career choice, political stances, and other important things. People cannot operate without others being involved to at least some small degree, and thus agency isn't quite as simple as it sounds.
Kellyn, I really like your reflection of Cooper's text. The idea of agency is a complex one and I have oftentimes found myself in a spiral of questions when diving deep into the subject. Cooper's argument that every decision we as individuals make are based on the data we collect--first or second hand experiences--is difficult to counteract. Even the most isolated individual is bound to make decisions based on the experiences of others, whether this is current externalities or ancestral/past influence. In a digital world, it is particularly difficult to comprehend the idea of free will and unbiased decision making as we are constantly being stimulated by outside sources.
ReplyDeleteYour example of getting a dog is perfect! Similarly, I have always grown up with dogs and never any other type of animal. When I moved out of my parents house a few years ago, our dog stayed at home but I wanted a pet of my own. I'd never had cats but my neighbor had two amazing outdoor cats that she'd adventure with and from that moment, I was hooked. While I would consider myself a cat person now and can't even remember a time that I didn't like cats, but it is clear that my "independent" decision to adopt a cat a few months later was not one of my own inherent desire, but one influenced by outside sources.
Kellyn,
ReplyDeleteI think you did a very good job at describing Cooper's article. The idea of agency is very complicated and one that I am still figuring out. Your idea that we are all influenced in some way I think is very accurate. We all, can of course make decisions on our own, but even in the slightest degree are influenced by the people around us. There is one quote I think that can correlate to your blog as well. Cooper said, "In the sense that our actions are always our own, we act with free will; agency is grounded in individual embodiment. But by virtue of that embodiment, we also exist in interaction with the surround (Cooper 440)." This idea shows that not only do we have influence on others for decisions, but also our actions. I think these two ideas coincide with each other. Our actions can also be influenced by those around us. I think who we find ourselves surrounded by, affects the person we become. Which in turn, decreases our own individual agency.